Dust exposure claim

We acted for one of a number of defendants in a claim where the plaintiff alleged loss of sight due to exposure to silica dust. Many defendants settled with the plaintiff, making payments totalling $300,000. We persevered with factual inquiries, which ultimately led to conclusive evidence that a loss of sight, such as that suffered by the plaintiff, was unrelated to dust exposure. The plaintiff’s verdict was just $330,000 – well below the initial claim of $2 million. Final costs were a fraction of the potential verdict.


Related Articles

Damages for loss of the age pension?

Legal Directions

Dibb v Amaca Pty Limited; Londos v Amaca Pty Limited Introduction On 22 August 2017, Judge Russell of the NSW Dust…

Continue reading

SA DECISION IS A WARNING TO CO-DEFENDANTS UNWILLING TO NEGOTIATE ON SETTLEMENT OFFERS

Legal Directions

Oliver v ACN 007 870 484 Pty Limited & 7 Ors (No.3) [2017] SADC 52 (His Honour Judge Gilchrist – District…

Continue reading

Trustees of the Sydney Grammar School v Winch [2013] NSWCA 37

Legal Directions

Introduction On 27 February 2013 the NSW Court of Appeal overturned its 1990 decision of Mangion v James Hardie & Co…

Continue reading