Opposing service of a conditional certificate of readiness

We acted for an insurer in successfully opposing the service of a conditional certificate of readiness in which the plaintiff reserved their right to serve further material after the execution of the certificate. The court agreed with our argument that section 139 of the Road Transport (Third Party Insurance) Act required the parties to serve a certificate that the matter is in all respects ready for hearing and for the conference. (McIntosh v Hikechukwu [2011] ACTSC 131)


Related Articles

AAI Limited v Fitzpatrick [2015] NSWSC 1108

Motor Vehicle Directions

On 10 August 2015, the Supreme Court of NSW upheld an insurer’s challenge to a MAS Assessor’s determination that a claimant…

Continue reading

Costs implications – early settlement of low value claims

Motor Vehicle Directions

Mark Haureluik v Bowen James Furler [2012] ACTCA 11 Damages for pain and suffering are included in the amount of the…

Continue reading

AAI Limited v Ali [2015] NSWSC 1068

Motor Vehicle Directions

Background The plaintiff, AAI, applied for judicial review of a MAS Assessment performed by Assessor Cameron, and also the decision of…

Continue reading