Medical Assessment Service assessor decision

The Supreme Court confirmed that in arriving at a determination a MAS assessor must do what the relevant guidelines require, but is not required to go beyond them. Further, where the guidelines direct the assessor on the proper method of assessment, a failure to record ranges of motion will not amount to a jurisdictional error. The plaintiff’s claim for relief failed and she was ordered to pay our client’s costs. (Stojanovic v MAA & Ors [2010] NSWSC 1090)


Related Articles

RECENT APPEAL DECISION CONFIRMS S151Z RECOVERIES WILL SUCCEED IN ‘BLAMELESS ACCIDENT’ CLAIMS

Motor Vehicle Directions

State of NSW v Wenham [2016] NSWSC 336 Decision of the NSW Court of Appeal on 5 December 2016 (Beazley ACJ, Meagher…

Continue reading

REFERRAL OF MATTER FOR TREATMENT DISPUTE AFTER DETERMINATION ON PERMANENT IMPAIRMENT DISPUTE

Motor Vehicle Directions

Sadr v Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd t/as Allianz Insurance & Anor [2017] NSWSC 1718 Facts The case was an application by…

Continue reading

Al Shmaeri v AAI Limited

Motor Vehicle Directions

Sydney District Court – Judge Williams presiding Judgement handed down on 29 October 2015 Background Mr Al Shmeari, the plaintiff, alleged…

Continue reading