Definition of ‘injury’

The NSW Court of Appeal considered the definition of ‘injury’ in the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (as it was) and confirmed that there must be both a ‘temporal’ and ‘causal’ connection between the driving alleged to be at fault and the injury. As a result, our insurer’s of the CTP policy did not have to respond to the claim. In addition, the impact of the Zotti decision is reflected by the fact that the Act was amended soon after it was handed down. (Zotti v AAMI & Anor [2009] NSWCA 323)


Related Articles

ACCIDENT-RELATED CAR HIRE CLAIMS – WHAT DAMAGES ARE PAYABLE?

Legal Directions

Beamish v Kanakis [2017] WADC 33 Background On 27 November 2010, Mr Kanakis purchased a 2006 Porsche Boxster convertible for $63,636.36…

Continue reading

AAI Limited v Fitzpatrick [2015] NSWSC 1108

Motor Vehicle Directions

On 10 August 2015, the Supreme Court of NSW upheld an insurer’s challenge to a MAS Assessor’s determination that a claimant…

Continue reading

Child injured in crash: occupier’s breach of duty or parent’s failure to supervise?

Legal Directions

Simpson v Grundy & Anor [2011] QSC 299 Introduction In this case the Queensland Supreme Court held an occupier was not…

Continue reading