Dust exposure claim

We acted for one of a number of defendants in a claim where the plaintiff alleged loss of sight due to exposure to silica dust. Many defendants settled with the plaintiff, making payments totalling $300,000. We persevered with factual inquiries, which ultimately led to conclusive evidence that a loss of sight, such as that suffered by the plaintiff, was unrelated to dust exposure. The plaintiff’s verdict was just $330,000 – well below the initial claim of $2 million. Final costs were a fraction of the potential verdict.


Related Articles

DDT constructs s151AB in intermittent exposure case

Legal Directions

Amaca Pty Limited v AAI Limited & Anor Re: Hastings Unreported Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales (1 March 2016)…

Continue reading

AMACA PTY LIMITED v LATZ – SA COURT DECISION MAY BE CONTROVERSIAL

Legal Directions

On 30 October 2017, the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia – by majority – rejected Amaca’s appeal…

Continue reading

SA DECISION IS A WARNING TO CO-DEFENDANTS UNWILLING TO NEGOTIATE ON SETTLEMENT OFFERS

Legal Directions

Oliver v ACN 007 870 484 Pty Limited & 7 Ors (No.3) [2017] SADC 52 (His Honour Judge Gilchrist – District…

Continue reading