Dust exposure claim

We acted for one of a number of defendants in a claim where the plaintiff alleged loss of sight due to exposure to silica dust. Many defendants settled with the plaintiff, making payments totalling $300,000. We persevered with factual inquiries, which ultimately led to conclusive evidence that a loss of sight, such as that suffered by the plaintiff, was unrelated to dust exposure. The plaintiff’s verdict was just $330,000 – well below the initial claim of $2 million. Final costs were a fraction of the potential verdict.


Related Articles

AMACA FOUND LIABLE FOR IN SITU ASBESTOS PRODUCTS AND LARGE EXEMPLARY DAMAGES

Legal Directions

Werfel v Amaca Pty Limited v The State of South Australia (South Australian Employment Tribunal 6 August 2019) Background The plaintiff, a 42…

Continue reading

SPECIAL COSTS ORDERS – PRINCIPLES – ORDER 66 RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT 1971 (WA)

Legal Directions

Terravision Pty Ltd v Black Box Control Pty Ltd [No 5] [2018] WASC 340 Facts Consideration of the appropriate costs orders…

Continue reading

Zwiersen v Field & Hall Pty Limited & Ors [2016] VSC 16 (29 January 2016)

Legal Directions

Introduction Zwiersen is a decision of Justice Rush of the Victorian Supreme Court concerning apportionment of liability between an employer and…

Continue reading