Financial Ombudsman Service determination

An insured alleged that he had suffered the insured event of ‘permanent total loss of use of two limbs’, entitling him to $300,000. We submitted that the fact that the insured could still walk short distances with crutches, albeit with severe pain, meant that he had not suffered ‘permanent total loss of use’ of the lower limbs. The Financial Ombudsman Service accepted this submission and determined in the insurer’s favour.


Related Articles

LIFE INSURER FOUND NOT TO HAVE BREACHED ITS OBLIGATIONS OF GOOD FAITH AND REASONABLENESS

Legal Directions

On 21 December 2018, Parker J of the New South Wales Supreme Court dismissed proceedings brought against MetLife Insurance Ltd (MetLife)…

Continue reading

Court finds member was TPD before he ceased work

Legal Directions

Harrison v Retail Employees Superannuation Pty Ltd and Anor [2015] NSWSC 1665, 10/11/2015 The NSW Supreme Court recently found that a…

Continue reading

NO FAILURE TO CONSIDER WHETHER THE INSURER ACTED REASONABLY OR FAIRLY

Legal Directions

Kim Newling v FSS Trustee Corporation [2018] NSWSC 1405 Background The appellant was a Member of the First State Superannuation Scheme.…

Continue reading