Fraudulent claim

A life insurer ceased paying partial disability benefits to a doctor on the basis of a medical opinion which suggested that the doctor was capable of returning to full-time work. This issue was strongly contested. After the doctor issued proceedings, we undertook extensive investigations (involving subpoenas, surveillance, etc) which revealed that the doctor had commenced running a home practice on a full-time basis. This enabled the life insurer to settle the claim for a nominal sum.


Related Articles

INSURER’S RESPONSIBILITIES WHEN DETERMINING TPD CLAIMS

Legal Directions

MetLife Insurance Limited v MX [2019] NSWCA 228 This is a decision by the NSW Court of Appeal of 16 September…

Continue reading

NO FAILURE TO CONSIDER WHETHER THE INSURER ACTED REASONABLY OR FAIRLY

Legal Directions

Kim Newling v FSS Trustee Corporation [2018] NSWSC 1405 Background The appellant was a Member of the First State Superannuation Scheme.…

Continue reading

A DIRECT CLAIM AGAINST AN INSURER OF A DEREGISTERED TORTFEASOR IS NOT AVAILABLE IN A CROSS-CLAIM

Legal Directions

Amaca Pty Limited v AAI Limited (Re: Simpson) [2019] NSWDDT 11 Introduction This judgment considers the application of ss4 and 5…

Continue reading