Fraudulent claim

A life insurer ceased paying partial disability benefits to a doctor on the basis of a medical opinion which suggested that the doctor was capable of returning to full-time work. This issue was strongly contested. After the doctor issued proceedings, we undertook extensive investigations (involving subpoenas, surveillance, etc) which revealed that the doctor had commenced running a home practice on a full-time basis. This enabled the life insurer to settle the claim for a nominal sum.


Related Articles

SPECIAL COSTS ORDERS – PRINCIPLES – ORDER 66 RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT 1971 (WA)

Legal Directions

Terravision Pty Ltd v Black Box Control Pty Ltd [No 5] [2018] WASC 340 Facts Consideration of the appropriate costs orders…

Continue reading

‘DUE CARE & SKILL’ – AUSTRALIAN CONSUMER LAW (CTH) VERSUS CIVIL LIABILITY ACT (NSW)

Legal Directions

Menz v Wagga Wagga Show Society Inc [2020] NSWCA 65 (21 April 2020) and Moore v Scenic Tours Pty Ltd [2020]…

Continue reading

12 MONTHS ON, HAYNE ROYAL COMMISSION DRAFT LEGISLATION SET TO CHANGE LIFE INSURANCE POLICIES

Legal Directions

Draft legislation has recently been released to implement the recommendations of the Royal Commission relating to changing – for most new…

Continue reading