Fraudulent claim

A life insurer ceased paying partial disability benefits to a doctor on the basis of a medical opinion which suggested that the doctor was capable of returning to full-time work. This issue was strongly contested. After the doctor issued proceedings, we undertook extensive investigations (involving subpoenas, surveillance, etc) which revealed that the doctor had commenced running a home practice on a full-time basis. This enabled the life insurer to settle the claim for a nominal sum.


Related Articles

SPECIAL COSTS ORDERS – PRINCIPLES – ORDER 66 RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT 1971 (WA)

Legal Directions

Terravision Pty Ltd v Black Box Control Pty Ltd [No 5] [2018] WASC 340 Facts Consideration of the appropriate costs orders…

Continue reading

LIFE INSURER FOUND NOT TO HAVE BREACHED ITS OBLIGATIONS OF GOOD FAITH AND REASONABLENESS

Legal Directions

On 21 December 2018, Parker J of the New South Wales Supreme Court dismissed proceedings brought against MetLife Insurance Ltd (MetLife)…

Continue reading

Court finds member was TPD before he ceased work

Legal Directions

Harrison v Retail Employees Superannuation Pty Ltd and Anor [2015] NSWSC 1665, 10/11/2015 The NSW Supreme Court recently found that a…

Continue reading