Compulsory conference and mandatory final offer test case

We acted for the insurer in the ACT Supreme Court in the first case to test the extent to which the court would dispense with a compulsory conference and mandatory final offer. The case involved multiple parties and different statutory schemesĀ  where liability was admitted to some but not in others. The court allowed the compulsory conference to be dispensed with, but not the mandatory final offer. (Furler v Haureliuk [2010] ACTSC 68)


Related Articles

ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO CALCULATING FUTURE ECONOMIC LOSS: CLOSED FIXED PERIOD V RETIREMENT AGE

Legal Directions

Utting v Clark [2017] ACTCA 22 Introduction The ACT Court of Appeal has considered whether, in awarding damages for the future,…

Continue reading

Partner Penny Moore joins Moray & Agnew

Media Release

Partner Penny Moore has left Jarman McKenna to join the Perth office of Moray & Agnew. Moore is well known and…

Continue reading

Making mandatory final offers where liability is denied

Motor Vehicle Directions

Benjamin Mitchell v Australian Capital Territory [2015] ACTMC 1 Date of Judgment: 23 June 2015 Before: Magistrate Morrison Background The defendant…

Continue reading