Compulsory conference and mandatory final offer test case

We acted for the insurer in the ACT Supreme Court in the first case to test the extent to which the court would dispense with a compulsory conference and mandatory final offer. The case involved multiple parties and different statutory schemes  where liability was admitted to some but not in others. The court allowed the compulsory conference to be dispensed with, but not the mandatory final offer. (Furler v Haureliuk [2010] ACTSC 68)


Related Articles

CAN AN INSURER WITHDRAW OR AMEND AN ADMISSION AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE ACT?

Motor Vehicle Directions

Carr v Needham [2019] ACTSC 98 Facts On 25 March 2015, the plaintiff was riding a motorcycle on a street in…

Continue reading

Al Shmaeri v AAI Limited

Motor Vehicle Directions

Sydney District Court – Judge Williams presiding Judgement handed down on 29 October 2015 Background Mr Al Shmeari, the plaintiff, alleged…

Continue reading

MAS Jurisdiction Clarified

Motor Vehicle Directions

Insurance Australia Ltd t/as NRMA Insurance v Scott [2016] NSWCA 138 Date of judgment: 22 June 2016 The New South Wales…

Continue reading