Makita (Australia) Pty Limited v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305

The NSW Court of Appeal held that, if an expert opinion is to carry any weight, it must sufficiently outline the proven facts and the matters assumed by the expert in providing the opinion. As a result, a verdict in excess of $1 million made against an employer was set aside.


Related Articles

High Court reinstates important distinction between injury and disease in compensation case

Legal Directions

Introduction and background On 11 May 2016, the High Court of Australia considered the meaning of “injury (other than a disease)”…

Continue reading

SPECIAL COSTS ORDERS – PRINCIPLES – ORDER 66 RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT 1971 (WA)

Legal Directions

Terravision Pty Ltd v Black Box Control Pty Ltd [No 5] [2018] WASC 340 Facts Consideration of the appropriate costs orders…

Continue reading

TAKE A SEAT – EMPLOYER LIABLE FOR DRIVER’S BUMPY RIDE

Legal Directions

Ciolpan v Swan Transit Services (South) Pty Ltd [2020] WADC 95 Background The plaintiff was working as a bus driver for…

Continue reading