Makita (Australia) Pty Limited v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305

The NSW Court of Appeal held that, if an expert opinion is to carry any weight, it must sufficiently outline the proven facts and the matters assumed by the expert in providing the opinion. As a result, a verdict in excess of $1 million made against an employer was set aside.


Related Articles

High Court provides further guidance on dependency claims arising from asbestosis

Legal Directions

Comcare v Starkey [2017] FCAFC 151 Introduction On 21 September 2017, the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia published…

Continue reading

APPEAL COURT OVERTURNS DECISION ON LIABILITY FOR CRIMINAL ACTS OF THIRD PERSON

Legal Directions

Optus Administration Pty Ltd v Glenn Wright by his tutor James Stuart Wright [2017] NSWCA 21 Background In our Legal Directions…

Continue reading

Seafarers Act – Expanded scope and intrusion on state compensation

Legal Directions

Samson Maritime Pty Limited v Aucote [2014] FCAFC 182 The scope of application of the Seafarers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1992…

Continue reading