Makita (Australia) Pty Limited v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305

The NSW Court of Appeal held that, if an expert opinion is to carry any weight, it must sufficiently outline the proven facts and the matters assumed by the expert in providing the opinion. As a result, a verdict in excess of $1 million made against an employer was set aside.


Related Articles

Tales of Byrne’s Demise are Greatly Exaggerated? The Amendment of Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld)

Legal Directions

Introduction The Queensland Parliament passed amendments to the Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld) (‘WCRA’) on 31 August 2016. It…

Continue reading

Non-employing entity found liable in negligence for criminal acts of a third person

Legal Directions

Wright by his tutor Wright v Optus Administration Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 160 At the time of preparing this article, we…

Continue reading

APPEAL COURT OVERTURNS DECISION ON LIABILITY FOR CRIMINAL ACTS OF THIRD PERSON

Legal Directions

Optus Administration Pty Ltd v Glenn Wright by his tutor James Stuart Wright [2017] NSWCA 21 Background In our Legal Directions…

Continue reading