Makita (Australia) Pty Limited v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305

The NSW Court of Appeal held that, if an expert opinion is to carry any weight, it must sufficiently outline the proven facts and the matters assumed by the expert in providing the opinion. As a result, a verdict in excess of $1 million made against an employer was set aside.


Related Articles

National firm welcomes increased capability in its Canberra office

Media Release

The announcement that Roger Hambly, a pre-eminent practitioner in ACT workers compensation law, has joined Moray & Agnew’s Canberra office confirms…

Continue reading

PERSONAL COSTS ORDERS IN WORKCOVER WA

Legal Directions

Rodgers v Amcor Ltd [2018] WADC 134 The District Court of WA considered an appeal from an Arbitrator’s orders that the…

Continue reading

WORK CAPACITY DECISION OR DENIAL OF LIABILITY?

Legal Directions

When can the Workers Compensation Commission (‘WCC’) determine the issue of weekly compensation? Sabanayagam v St George Bank Ltd [2016] NSWCA…

Continue reading