Opposing service of a conditional certificate of readiness

We acted for an insurer in successfully opposing the service of a conditional certificate of readiness in which the plaintiff reserved their right to serve further material after the execution of the certificate. The court agreed with our argument that section 139 of the Road Transport (Third Party Insurance) Act required the parties to serve a certificate that the matter is in all respects ready for hearing and for the conference. (McIntosh v Hikechukwu [2011] ACTSC 131)


Related Articles

FAILURE TO GIVE NOTICE – SECTIONS 29 AND 29A – MOTOR VEHICLE (THIRD PARTY INSURANCE) ACT 1943 (WA)

Motor Vehicle Directions

Howell v Smith [2018] WADC 125 Facts The plaintiff was involved in a motor vehicle accident in 2013. He made a…

Continue reading

RECENT APPEAL DECISION CONFIRMS S151Z RECOVERIES WILL SUCCEED IN ‘BLAMELESS ACCIDENT’ CLAIMS

Motor Vehicle Directions

State of NSW v Wenham [2016] NSWSC 336 Decision of the NSW Court of Appeal on 5 December 2016 (Beazley ACJ, Meagher…

Continue reading

‘DUE CARE & SKILL’ – AUSTRALIAN CONSUMER LAW (CTH) VERSUS CIVIL LIABILITY ACT (NSW)

Legal Directions

Menz v Wagga Wagga Show Society Inc [2020] NSWCA 65 (21 April 2020) and Moore v Scenic Tours Pty Ltd [2020]…

Continue reading