Opposing service of a conditional certificate of readiness

We acted for an insurer in successfully opposing the service of a conditional certificate of readiness in which the plaintiff reserved their right to serve further material after the execution of the certificate. The court agreed with our argument that section 139 of the Road Transport (Third Party Insurance) Act required the parties to serve a certificate that the matter is in all respects ready for hearing and for the conference. (McIntosh v Hikechukwu [2011] ACTSC 131)


Related Articles

ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO CALCULATING FUTURE ECONOMIC LOSS: CLOSED FIXED PERIOD V RETIREMENT AGE

Legal Directions

Utting v Clark [2017] ACTCA 22 Introduction The ACT Court of Appeal has considered whether, in awarding damages for the future,…

Continue reading

RECENT APPEAL DECISION CLARIFIES ‘BLAMELESS ACCIDENT’ PROVISIONS IN NSW MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENTS

Motor Vehicle Directions

Whitfield and Anor v Melenewycz [2016] NSWCA 235 Decision of the NSW Court of Appeal on 31 August 2016 before Meagher…

Continue reading

SPECIAL COSTS ORDERS – PRINCIPLES – ORDER 66 RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT 1971 (WA)

Legal Directions

Terravision Pty Ltd v Black Box Control Pty Ltd [No 5] [2018] WASC 340 Facts Consideration of the appropriate costs orders…

Continue reading