Opposing service of a conditional certificate of readiness

We acted for an insurer in successfully opposing the service of a conditional certificate of readiness in which the plaintiff reserved their right to serve further material after the execution of the certificate. The court agreed with our argument that section 139 of the Road Transport (Third Party Insurance) Act required the parties to serve a certificate that the matter is in all respects ready for hearing and for the conference. (McIntosh v Hikechukwu [2011] ACTSC 131)


Related Articles

CALDERBANK OFFERS & OFFERS OF COMPROMISE DECISION LIKELY TO AFFECT FUTURE LITIGATION IN ACT

Legal Directions

Cooper v Singh [2017] ACTCA 21 Introduction In a recent decision, the ACT Court of Appeal has considered the distinction, in…

Continue reading

CAN AN INSURER WITHDRAW OR AMEND AN ADMISSION AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE ACT?

Motor Vehicle Directions

Carr v Needham [2019] ACTSC 98 Facts On 25 March 2015, the plaintiff was riding a motorcycle on a street in…

Continue reading

Partner Penny Moore joins Moray & Agnew

Media Release

Partner Penny Moore has left Jarman McKenna to join the Perth office of Moray & Agnew. Moore is well known and…

Continue reading