Medical Assessment Service assessor decision

The Supreme Court confirmed that in arriving at a determination a MAS assessor must do what the relevant guidelines require, but is not required to go beyond them. Further, where the guidelines direct the assessor on the proper method of assessment, a failure to record ranges of motion will not amount to a jurisdictional error. The plaintiff’s claim for relief failed and she was ordered to pay our client’s costs. (Stojanovic v MAA & Ors [2010] NSWSC 1090)


Related Articles

ACCIDENT-RELATED CAR HIRE CLAIMS – WHAT DAMAGES ARE PAYABLE?

Legal Directions

Beamish v Kanakis [2017] WADC 33 Background On 27 November 2010, Mr Kanakis purchased a 2006 Porsche Boxster convertible for $63,636.36…

Continue reading

AAI Limited v Ali [2015] NSWSC 1068

Motor Vehicle Directions

Background The plaintiff, AAI, applied for judicial review of a MAS Assessment performed by Assessor Cameron, and also the decision of…

Continue reading

RECENT APPEAL DECISION CONFIRMS S151Z RECOVERIES WILL SUCCEED IN ‘BLAMELESS ACCIDENT’ CLAIMS

Motor Vehicle Directions

State of NSW v Wenham [2016] NSWSC 336 Decision of the NSW Court of Appeal on 5 December 2016 (Beazley ACJ, Meagher…

Continue reading