Medical Assessment Service assessor decision

The Supreme Court confirmed that in arriving at a determination a MAS assessor must do what the relevant guidelines require, but is not required to go beyond them. Further, where the guidelines direct the assessor on the proper method of assessment, a failure to record ranges of motion will not amount to a jurisdictional error. The plaintiff’s claim for relief failed and she was ordered to pay our client’s costs. (Stojanovic v MAA & Ors [2010] NSWSC 1090)


Related Articles

AAI Limited v Ali [2015] NSWSC 1068

Motor Vehicle Directions

Background The plaintiff, AAI, applied for judicial review of a MAS Assessment performed by Assessor Cameron, and also the decision of…

Continue reading

PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS IN MAS ASSESSMENTS CUTS BOTH WAYS

Motor Vehicle Directions

Dominice v Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd [2017] NSWCA 171 Date of Judgment: 12 July 2017 Summary The NSW Court of Appeal…

Continue reading

ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO CALCULATING FUTURE ECONOMIC LOSS: CLOSED FIXED PERIOD V RETIREMENT AGE

Legal Directions

Utting v Clark [2017] ACTCA 22 Introduction The ACT Court of Appeal has considered whether, in awarding damages for the future,…

Continue reading