Medical Assessment Service assessor decision

The Supreme Court confirmed that in arriving at a determination a MAS assessor must do what the relevant guidelines require, but is not required to go beyond them. Further, where the guidelines direct the assessor on the proper method of assessment, a failure to record ranges of motion will not amount to a jurisdictional error. The plaintiff’s claim for relief failed and she was ordered to pay our client’s costs. (Stojanovic v MAA & Ors [2010] NSWSC 1090)


Related Articles

REFERRAL OF MATTER FOR TREATMENT DISPUTE AFTER DETERMINATION ON PERMANENT IMPAIRMENT DISPUTE

Motor Vehicle Directions

Sadr v Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd t/as Allianz Insurance & Anor [2017] NSWSC 1718 Facts The case was an application by…

Continue reading

CALDERBANK OFFERS & OFFERS OF COMPROMISE DECISION LIKELY TO AFFECT FUTURE LITIGATION IN ACT

Legal Directions

Cooper v Singh [2017] ACTCA 21 Introduction In a recent decision, the ACT Court of Appeal has considered the distinction, in…

Continue reading

CAN AN INSURER WITHDRAW OR AMEND AN ADMISSION AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE ACT?

Motor Vehicle Directions

Carr v Needham [2019] ACTSC 98 Facts On 25 March 2015, the plaintiff was riding a motorcycle on a street in…

Continue reading