Medical Assessment Service assessor decision

The Supreme Court confirmed that in arriving at a determination a MAS assessor must do what the relevant guidelines require, but is not required to go beyond them. Further, where the guidelines direct the assessor on the proper method of assessment, a failure to record ranges of motion will not amount to a jurisdictional error. The plaintiff’s claim for relief failed and she was ordered to pay our client’s costs. (Stojanovic v MAA & Ors [2010] NSWSC 1090)


Related Articles

Al Shmaeri v AAI Limited

Motor Vehicle Directions

Sydney District Court – Judge Williams presiding Judgement handed down on 29 October 2015 Background Mr Al Shmeari, the plaintiff, alleged…

Continue reading

Pre-existing condition and the shifting evidentiary onus

Motor Vehicle Directions

Glen v Sullivan [2015] NSWCA191 Date of Judgment: 9 July 2015 NSW Court of Appeal: Sackville AJA with Beazley P and…

Continue reading

CALDERBANK OFFERS & OFFERS OF COMPROMISE DECISION LIKELY TO AFFECT FUTURE LITIGATION IN ACT

Legal Directions

Cooper v Singh [2017] ACTCA 21 Introduction In a recent decision, the ACT Court of Appeal has considered the distinction, in…

Continue reading