Third runway PI claim successfully defended

We advised the professional indemnity insurer of the construction contractor for the third runway of the Sydney airport. The claim on the PI policy was defeated at trial and an indemnity costs award made against the contractor in favour of the insurer.


Related Articles

WASTE NOT, WANT NOT: A QUESTION OF INTERPRETATION

Legal Directions

Aquagenics Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v Certain Underwriters at Lloyds subscribing to contract number NCP106108663 [2017] FCA 634 Introduction In a recent…

Continue reading

REACHING THE TOP OF THE TOWER (OF PI INSURANCE)

Legal Directions

Introduction In the English case WR Berkley Insurance (Europe) Limited v Teal Assurance Company Limited [2017] EWCA Civ 25, the Court…

Continue reading

In the matter of HIH Insurance Limited (in liquidation) & Ors [2016] NSWSC 482

Legal Directions

Introduction The issue of ‘indirect market based’ causation has been an evolving one, particularly in the context of shareholder class actions.…

Continue reading