Vietnam war veteran – post-traumatic stress disorder

A Vietnam War veteran suffered post-traumatic stress disorder as a consequence of his participation in the Vietnam War.  We defended the Supreme Court proceeding on the basis that the life insurer was entitled to avoid the policy on the ground of fraudulent non-disclosure, the life insurer acted reasonably in forming the opinion that the insured did not meet the TPD definition and that the war exclusion had been triggered.  After convening an early conference, the matter settled for a modest sum at a time when both parties’ legal costs were very low.


Related Articles

SPECIAL COSTS ORDERS – PRINCIPLES – ORDER 66 RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT 1971 (WA)

Legal Directions

Terravision Pty Ltd v Black Box Control Pty Ltd [No 5] [2018] WASC 340 Facts Consideration of the appropriate costs orders…

Continue reading

Court finds member was TPD before he ceased work

Legal Directions

Harrison v Retail Employees Superannuation Pty Ltd and Anor [2015] NSWSC 1665, 10/11/2015 The NSW Supreme Court recently found that a…

Continue reading

LIFE INSURER FOUND NOT TO HAVE BREACHED ITS OBLIGATIONS OF GOOD FAITH AND REASONABLENESS

Legal Directions

On 21 December 2018, Parker J of the New South Wales Supreme Court dismissed proceedings brought against MetLife Insurance Ltd (MetLife)…

Continue reading