Definition of ‘injury’

The NSW Court of Appeal considered the definition of ‘injury’ in the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (as it was) and confirmed that there must be both a ‘temporal’ and ‘causal’ connection between the driving alleged to be at fault and the injury. As a result, our insurer’s of the CTP policy did not have to respond to the claim. In addition, the impact of the Zotti decision is reflected by the fact that the Act was amended soon after it was handed down. (Zotti v AAMI & Anor [2009] NSWCA 323)


Related Articles

CALDERBANK OFFERS & OFFERS OF COMPROMISE DECISION LIKELY TO AFFECT FUTURE LITIGATION IN ACT

Legal Directions

Cooper v Singh [2017] ACTCA 21 Introduction In a recent decision, the ACT Court of Appeal has considered the distinction, in…

Continue reading

RECENT APPEAL DECISION CONFIRMS S151Z RECOVERIES WILL SUCCEED IN ‘BLAMELESS ACCIDENT’ CLAIMS

Motor Vehicle Directions

State of NSW v Wenham [2016] NSWSC 336 Decision of the NSW Court of Appeal on 5 December 2016 (Beazley ACJ, Meagher…

Continue reading

Use of Surveillance in Personal Injury Matters

Motor Vehicle Directions

Fuller v Allen & Anor [2020] ACTSC 32 and Fuller v Allen & Anor (No 2) [2020] ACTSC 119 (decisions of…

Continue reading