Archive: June 2018
featured article
Reminder: Interpret the interaction of policy provisions, not each provision in isolation
Legal Directions
September 18, 2013
The New South Wales Court of Appeal recently found that a claim for indemnity was subject to a large excess even…
Continue readingArchives
20
19
19
20
18
18
20
17
17
PR
EV
EV
- January 2016
- February 2016
- March 2016
- April 2016
- May 2016
- June 2016
- July 2016
- September 2016
- October 2016
- November 2016
- December 2016
- February 2015
- April 2015
- May 2015
- June 2015
- July 2015
- August 2015
- September 2015
- October 2015
- November 2015
- December 2015
- February 2014
- May 2014
- July 2014
- October 2014
- February 2013
- March 2013
- April 2013
- June 2013
- August 2013
- September 2013
- February 2012
- March 2012
- April 2012
- May 2012
- June 2012
- December 2012
JUST WHAT THE DOCTOR EXPECTED: SCOPE OF AUDITOR’S DUTIES – THE APPEAL
Summary of Decision Facts The appellant, Cam & Bear Pty Ltd, was the trustee of a self-managed superannuation fund (the Fund)…
NO GROWTH IN CATEGORIES OF CASES IN WHICH A NON-DELEGABLE DUTY OF CARE IS OWED
In the recent decision in Bettergrow Pty Ltd v NSW Electricity Networks Operations Pty Ltd as trustee for NSW Electricity Networks…
HIGH COURT CONSIDERS RECOVERABLE ECONOMIC LOSS IN THE ‘LOST YEARS’ FOLLOWING DEATH
Publication of Reasons 13 June 2018 Amaca Pty Limited v Latz, Latz v Amaca Pty Limited [2018] HCA 22 Summary In…
APPEAL OUTCOME REMINDS INSURERS TO CONSIDER FULL WORDING & EFFECT IN POLICY CONSTRUCTION
WFI Insurance Ltd v Manitowoq Platinum Pty Ltd [2018] WASCA 89 Background In our Legal Directions dated 1 May 2017, we…
COMPETING GETSWIFT CLASS ACTIONS TOLD TO GET STUFFED
The Australian class action landscape has seen unprecedented growth in the past decade. Part of that growth has been the troubling…